RKPD Kabupaten Klungkung 2025 — Policy Review

Lampiran Peraturan Bupati Klungkung Nomor 12 Tahun 2024

Policy

Policy

Policy

Mar 10, 2025

Mar 10, 2025

Mar 10, 2025

4 min read

4 min read

4 min read

Written by

Written by

Santi Capital

Santi Capital

RKPD 2025 is Klungkung’s one-year plan that turns strategy into funded programs, indicators, and accountability for the 2025 budget year. By law it sets the economic frame, development priorities, workplan and financing for 12 months and serves as the formal guide to RAPBD 2025, ensuring planning and budgeting stay consistent.

For investors, the document matters because it (1) locks in what the government will prioritize and monitor in 2025, (2) ties programs to measurable indicators that de-risk performance-based agreements, and (3) sits inside a clear intergovernmental alignment (RKP 2025 & RKPD Provinsi Bali 2025, derived from RPJMN 2025–2029).

Legal role, process & timing

  • What RKPD is: a one-year planning document containing the regional economic framework, priorities, workplan and financing, compiled with reference to the RPD, national RKP, and strategic national programs; it is the guide for the RAPBD so planning and budgeting remain consistent.

  • Document linkages: RKPD 2025 is the basis for KUA, PPAS, RKA and ultimately the RAPBD 2025.

  • Upstream alignment: The 2025 RKPD aligns to RKP 2025 and RKPD Provinsi Bali 2025, which themselves are elaborations of RPJMN 2025–2029 and Bali’s RPD 2024–2026.

  • Finalization & facilitation: After Musrenbang and internal consolidation, the draft Peraturan Bupati tentang RKPD is sent to the Governor (via Bappeda Provinsi) for fasilitasi; after facilitation, the Regent enacts the Perbup no later than one week after the Provincial RKPD is set.

Why this matters: your proposals and PPP structures should map to RKPD nomenclature and indicators so they can be captured in KUA–PPAS → RAPBD on time.

2025 priorities & headline indicators (the “scoreboard” you should design to)

RKPD 2025 lays out priority outcomes with explicit indicators/targets. Key ones include:

  • Basic service infrastructure equity

    • Goal: reduce infrastructure inequality and build equitable public-service infrastructure.

    • Indicators: Infrastructure inequality index (19.9); coverage of villages/kelurahan meeting basic-service infrastructure standards (72.88).

  • Environment & resilience

    • Targets: Environmental Quality Index (DLHP) 71.63; Disaster Risk Index 122.41; Water Quality Index 72.85. These are central ESG baselines for site selection and design.

  • Governance & service reform

    • Targets: Bureaucratic Reform Index 83; Performance Accountability Evaluation score (SAKIP) 70.49; Regional Innovation Index 62.5; Political Stability Index (Kesbang) 83. These indicate a push for better permitting, procurement, and institutional comfort for investors.

  • Human development & demographic quality (illustrative cross-reference in the matrix): TFR 2.1; NRR 1; LPP 1.1 and 53 “desa mandiri” as part of village development targets. These speak to labour quality and community capacity near project sites.

Investor read: these figures are not slogans; they are the KPIs OPDs must report on in 2025. Build your contracts and impact metrics around them.

Sector lenses investors care about (as structured in RKPD 2025)

  1. Infrastructure & utilities for service quality
    RKPD 2025 frames “pembangunan infrastruktur untuk mendorong peningkatan kualitas pelayanan publik” as a core objective, measured by coverage and inequality indices above. Program listings and financing are consolidated in Bab V – Rencana Kerja dan Pendanaan Daerah (your map to program codes, OPD leads, and indicative allocations).

  2. Environment, water, and resilience
    The inclusion of DLHP, water quality, and disaster-risk targets at RKPD level signals budget and regulatory attention to “green” performance in 2025. Designs that deliver quantifiable gains on these indices will be inherently policy-aligned.

  3. Governance, procurement, and service reform
    Raising the Reform Index and SAKIP score is explicitly targeted—an enabling signal for PPPs, compliance-heavy operations, and performance-based O&M. The plan’s role as basis for KUA/PPAS/RKA gives you a procedural path to embed projects.

  4. Human capital & village competitiveness
    Targets on demographic quality and desa mandiri point to continued investment in community capacity (useful for workforce stability and local procurement chains around projects).

Governance mechanics you can use (to get deals budget-aligned)

  • Musrenbang → fasilitasi → Perbup: RKPD’s process culminates in a Governor facilitation letter and Perbup enactment within a week of the provincial RKPD—this is the administrative window to ensure your project’s nomenclature, indicator, and location are captured.

  • Downstream hooks: Because RKPD is the pedoman for KUA, PPAS, RKA, RAPBD 2025, aligning your proposal language to RKPD tables maximizes the odds of inclusion and disbursement.

  • Evidence base for baselining: The document includes historical performance figures/graphics across infrastructure and public-service metrics (e.g., road condition, rural transport, irrigation, security/social conflict, and development indicators 2018–2023), which are useful for establishing project baselines.

Why this matters for prospective investors

1) Build to the indicators.
Payment triggers, ESG covenants, and community-benefit targets should be framed against RKPD 2025 KPIs: e.g., commit to improving DLHP or water quality, raising service-infrastructure coverage, or supporting reform/accountability scores through digital permitting/compliance tools.

2) Time proposals to the budget mechanics.
Aim to align with KUA–PPAS formation and any subsequent adjustments; your proposal should already match RKPD nomenclature (program/activity, indicator, location) to be slotted into RKA/RAPBD 2025 without friction.

3) Prioritize infrastructure, water-environment, and governance tech.
These areas have explicit 2025 targets and are likely to see continued administrative support. Solutions that quantifiably move the infrastructure coverage, DLHP, water quality, or risk indices will be advantaged.

4) Embed local capacity and stability.
Village-level targets (e.g., desa mandiri) and stability index objectives strengthen the case for local hiring, MSME supply chains, and community partnerships around sites—good for both policy fit and operations.

Bottom line

RKPD 2025 provides a clear, metric-driven agenda: equitable service infrastructure, measurable environmental quality, disaster-risk management, and accelerated governance reform—all tied to budget instruments (KUA/PPAS/RKA/RAPBD) and coordinated with national/provincial plans. For Santi Capital and partners, the investable lanes in 2025 are those that lift the official indicators while fitting RKPD program structures—especially infrastructure & utilities, water-environment systems, and governance/enabling tech. This is how to de-risk approvals, unlock co-funding, and demonstrate impact in Klungkung this year.

Continue reading